HILARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT?

For all those who think Hilary Clinton will be “different” (just as we all felt Barack Obama would be different) please be aware that she has already “sold her soul” to Halliburton, Monsanto, Martin Marietta, Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, Pepsi and Coke, McDonalds, Burger King, JPMorgan Chase, Bank Of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, assuring her of their monetary support in exchange for her support of their programs and agendas.  It will be business as usual for Hilary and the big contributors.  It takes roughly one billion dollars to run for president.  That money is already in Hilary’s back pocket and her soul in their offices.

 

Now, let’s look at Hilary’s resume…

 

Ms. Clinton was personally responsible for Ambassador Stevens being killed in the embassy in Benghazi.  She wanted the Benghazi “station”, which at the time was not an embassy, to be certified as such.  She sent Ambassador Stevens back into Libya to finish the paperwork upgrading the facility – before her eminent visit – to convert the shanty complex into a permanent mission as a symbol of the new Libya.  Stevens was up against a very specific funding deadline to complete an extensive survey of the mission so the compound could be converted.

Ms. Clinton wanted to cover up the fact weapons had been transferred through the station to the rebels forces in Syria fighting Basar al-Assad….who just happened to be al-Qaeda affiliated groups.  This was a carbon-copy of Obama’s “Fast and Furious gun running program.  The administration did not want any word or proof of that operation exposed.

 

Just days before the attack, the U.S., with Ambassador Stevens as the point man, secretly began a program to collect those weapons from radical groups.  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed to providing forty million dollars to assist Libya’s efforts to secure and recover its weapons stockpiles.  One source said that Stevens was in Benghazi the very night of the attack “to negotiate a weapons transfer in an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists.”

Adm. Brian L. Losey, former commander of the U.S. Special Operations Command in Africa, conceded in congressional testimony that prior to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack, he was not aware of the existence of the U.S. special mission in Benghazi or the nearby CIA annex.
Because of the threat level in Libya, specifically Benghazi, there was the only person who could wave the travel restriction.  That one person was Hilary Clinton.  The reason for the threat level being so high was due to the capture of a high level al-Qaeda leader the week before, not, as fabricated, a video defaming the Prophet Muhammad.

Clinton personally signed waivers that allowed the facility to be legally occupied, since it did not meet the minimum official security standards set by the State Department.

Meanwhile due to that threat level, the embassy in Tripoli was packing up, smashing hard drives and shredding documents.

Even when the station in Benghazi was under attack, Hilary refused to send in the troops as that would send a bad message that Libya was not secure…and was not a shinning example of successful US policy .  General Ham as head of Africom received the same distress e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place at the Benghazi station.  General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.  General Ham then received the order to stand down…by orders from the State Department.  His response was to screw it; he was going to help anyhow.  Within thirty seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

Three intelligence reports circulated in the months before the attack.  Each report showed intelligence agencies warning the State Department (and) warning the Defense Department there was an al-Qaeda build-up in Benghazi.  One of those reports included photographs of more than 300 al-Qaeda operatives in Martyr’s Square.  That is down-town Benghazi, less than a mile from the diplomatic outpost where the ambassador died.

In those photographs showed the rebels waving guns. There was a quote mentioned in the intelligence report in which the leader of al-Qaeda in Benghazi said, “If the U.S. doesn’t leave we were going to kill the U.S. ambassador.”

This version of events contradicts Mr. Panetta’s October 25 statement that General Ham advised against intervention.  The Obama White House is famously vindictive against perceived disloyalty – the administration would not let Ham get away with scolding them for failing to show the leadership necessary to save American lives.  The Army’s ethos is to leave no man behind, but that is not shared by a spineless, impotent president.
At a memorial service to the fallen Hilary told Charles Woods, father of slain former Navy Seal Tyrone Woods, that “We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.”  In that situation one would expect her to vow to take down the terrorists who killed Tyrone, not the supposed instigator of the spontaneous mob action that never happened.

Mrs. Clinton believed that the parents of the slain Americans would empathize with her outrage at the filmmaker, rather than reserve their anger for the extremists who actually did the killing.  But as Mr. Woods said, “I could tell that she was flat out lying to me.”

Hilary killed Ambassador Stevens as clearly as if she had pulled the trigger herself.

In the Senate, Hilary voted for military action more times than the most vocal, ardent supporter of military action in the Senate: John, “shoot first and ask questions later” McCain.  Hilary feels the needed to “out aggress” all the men.  If she is so gung-ho to send young, idealistic boys to get killed to fulfill her personal need for a display of power, then let her grab a gun and go to the front lines herself.

My political commentary is meant to bring a heightened consciousness and real discussion to people intent on changing social, political, and economic conditions. Politics as usual is destroying our Democracy. Government corruption demands real political change, not just a new candidate in the old system. Political leadership only leads to self-serving agendas and self aggrandizement. Politicians eschew social causes for personal enrichment. Political power corrupt morality and rationality. The result is criminal behavior and Constitutional crimes.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

If you appreciate my articles, please check out my books. I think you'll really enjoy them Just use the link below to go directly to my website.

www.politicalnovel.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *